Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Buzzword Bonanza
Elias Levy, SecurityFocus 2000-05-01

Security companies can make headlines by using the right jargon, even when it's wrong.

Comments Mode:
A couple of comments 2000-05-01
Anonymous (3 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-01
Elias Levy <aleph1 (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-01
Elias Levy <aleph1 (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]> (3 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Elias Levy <aleph1 (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]>
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Elias Levy <aleph1 (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Elias Levy <aleph1 (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]>
Re: A definition from an observer 2000-05-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: A definition from an observer 2000-05-05
Anonymous
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
I would tend to agree with Mr. Levy, in that the traditional meaning of a "backdoor" implies both intent and subterfuge, among other things. This is not the equivalent of a "default password", even though the potential outcome of exploiting either vulnerability is roughly the same.

What we are lacking here is a common lexicon, that could provide clear definitions for these, and other, ITSEC terms. Was there not a bugtraq related project that sought to do just this, provide a common set of definitions for terminology related to vulnerabilities?

Further to this question, I would like to see us derive some more "professional" sounding terms for things like "back doors". If we are going to develop ITSEC into a serious profession, we really need to dispense with the "geek speak", and at least attempt to sound serious about our work!

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/25/1599#1599
Re: A couple of comments 2000-05-03
Anonymous
A couple of comments 2000-05-02
Matthew Pemble <matthew (at) idrach (dot) com [email concealed]>
A couple of comments 2000-05-05
Anonymous
Glad to see this... 2000-05-01
Anonymous
Simple solution. 2000-05-04
Anonymous
Not back door by Def. used 2000-05-05
Anonymous
Microsoft did the same at Win2K 2000-05-05
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus