, SecurityFocus 2001-11-09
Five computer security firms join Microsoft to set an official standard for limiting disclosure of software security holes
Expand all |
Post comment
Such a policy for disclosure already exists
2001-11-09
Dumky (1 replies)
Dumky (1 replies)
Such a policy for disclosure already exists
2001-11-10
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]>
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]>
...on second thought...Kudos!
2001-11-09
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
So what would force Microsoft to patch these holes if exploits are not published?
2001-11-10
Rafal Sybilla-Leszczynski (1 replies)
Rafal Sybilla-Leszczynski (1 replies)
So what would force Microsoft to patch these holes if exploits are not published?
2001-11-12
Anonymous
Anonymous
Microsoft have no server monopoly: this may reduce their share
2001-11-12
Kirsten Bayes (kirruth@hushmail)
Kirsten Bayes (kirruth@hushmail)
Mark Loveless has posted exploit code on his NMRC site. The tools offered up by the RAZOR team can be used by admins as well as attackers.
This most definitely seems to be an attempt to form an information cartel.
One question does come to mind...if BindView has signed up for this, and NMRC.ORG (is|was originally) Mark Loveless's site, how does hellNbak's call for Informaiton Anarchy fit into the equation?
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/281/8671#8671