, SecurityFocus 2001-11-09
Five computer security firms join Microsoft to set an official standard for limiting disclosure of software security holes
Expand all |
Post comment
Shocking developments
2001-11-09
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]> (2 replies)
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]> (2 replies)
Such a policy for disclosure already exists
2001-11-09
Dumky (1 replies)
Dumky (1 replies)
Such a policy for disclosure already exists
2001-11-10
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]>
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]>
...on second thought...Kudos!
2001-11-09
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]> (1 replies)
So what would force Microsoft to patch these holes if exploits are not published?
2001-11-10
Rafal Sybilla-Leszczynski (1 replies)
Rafal Sybilla-Leszczynski (1 replies)
So what would force Microsoft to patch these holes if exploits are not published?
2001-11-12
Anonymous
Anonymous
Microsoft have no server monopoly: this may reduce their share
2001-11-12
Kirsten Bayes (kirruth@hushmail)
Kirsten Bayes (kirruth@hushmail)
I am Sisyphus as it is my job to provide firewall security for my clients. How in the name of the unholy do I stop a printf command. When some body figures out how to install this lovely little bomb in your startup group, you are toasted and so is your system.
Words fail convey my contempt for that company. Just how big of a "KICK ME HARD" sign do you have to put on people before they change their ways?
It is going to be one hell of a Christmas!!
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/281/8704#8704