, SecurityFocus 2002-01-24
A guide to judging Microsoft's security progress.
Expand all |
Post comment
Results, Not Resolutions
2002-01-24
David Litchfield (2 replies)
David Litchfield (2 replies)
|
Results, Not Resolutions
, SecurityFocus 2002-01-24 A guide to judging Microsoft's security progress.
Expand all |
Post comment
Results, Not Resolutions
2002-01-24 David Litchfield (2 replies) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
The problem they're pointing out is much deeper. There seems to be a headlong dash to add more eye candy and whizz-bang functionality that is completely useless. For example, when was the last time you really *needed* to embed code in an email? This impacts less obvious user-level security issues - marketing companies truly love all of the HTML-rendering email clients in the world where a customized image tag in each message sent lets them know that your email address is valid as soon as your oh-so-friendly emailer opens their email unbidden. There is a price to be paid for too much flexibility, and security is part of it.
Whether written in Java or hand-coded assembler, the same issues are still there.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/315/10148#10148