Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Results, Not Resolutions
Bruce Schneier and Adam Shostack , SecurityFocus 2002-01-24

A guide to judging Microsoft's security progress.

Comments Mode:
Results, not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Results, not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Gary McGraw
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
David Litchfield (2 replies)
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
davep (at) pitt (dot) edu [email concealed] (1 replies)
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Nicholas Harring
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Well, to conclude: Use Java, M$ 2002-01-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Well, to conclude: Use Java, M$ 2002-01-25
Trithemius (1 replies)
Many of the points made in the article go well above matters of language vulnerabilities. Sure, Java has built-in insulation against buffer overruns. So does a properly designed C application. Nothing is free, including Java's safety and insulation.

The problem they're pointing out is much deeper. There seems to be a headlong dash to add more eye candy and whizz-bang functionality that is completely useless. For example, when was the last time you really *needed* to embed code in an email? This impacts less obvious user-level security issues - marketing companies truly love all of the HTML-rendering email clients in the world where a customized image tag in each message sent lets them know that your email address is valid as soon as your oh-so-friendly emailer opens their email unbidden. There is a price to be paid for too much flexibility, and security is part of it.

Whether written in Java or hand-coded assembler, the same issues are still there.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/315/10148#10148
Well, to conclude: Use Java, M$ 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
BMaximus
SOAP Recommendation is Silly 2002-01-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
SOAP Rec is correct 2002-01-26
Anonymous
Almost right on the compensation 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Chris
Regarding macros in documents... 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Things getting out of hand here? 2002-01-26
Toni Heinonen
Microkernel smog 2002-01-27
Grumpf
Inaccuracies and crazy talk 2002-01-28
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-28
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus