Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Results, Not Resolutions
Bruce Schneier and Adam Shostack , SecurityFocus 2002-01-24

A guide to judging Microsoft's security progress.

Comments Mode:
Results, not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Results, not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Gary McGraw
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
David Litchfield (2 replies)
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
davep (at) pitt (dot) edu [email concealed] (1 replies)
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Nicholas Harring
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-24
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Well, to conclude: Use Java, M$ 2002-01-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Well, to conclude: Use Java, M$ 2002-01-25
Trithemius (1 replies)
Well, to conclude: Use Java, M$ 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
BMaximus
SOAP Recommendation is Silly 2002-01-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
SOAP Rec is correct 2002-01-26
Anonymous
Almost right on the compensation 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-25
Chris
Regarding macros in documents... 2002-01-25
Anonymous
Things getting out of hand here? 2002-01-26
Toni Heinonen
Microkernel smog 2002-01-27
Grumpf
If SOAP should go then so should CGI! 2002-01-28
TerryC
Asking for the elimination of SOAP is silly. SOAP is just a set of XML requests and responses carried through HTTP. I can set up an html form and ask a user to cut and paste an XML document into a text window and upload it via a submit button. I can form a response and return it as an XML document. All this over HTTP. Eliminate CGI!

As always, applications have to be scrutinized for bad or dangerous behavior. Not easy. SOAP adds little more complexity than already exists. A SOAP RPC call to update the database is not much different than a cgi form to update the database. SOAP adds another thing for a security analyst to look at (which does increase the complexity of their job a bit), but that's life.

As for the other measures proposed, I'm not sure they are all very practical. Many of the proposals enable the possibility of a more secure system. But in the ends of an inexperienced end user I don't think you are much farther ahead. The biggest challenge is getting the trade off between usability and security just right.

Time will tell if MS will live up to their promises. Even though I can bash MS as much as anybody, I believe they are serious and will make security a priority, and that you will see better product out the door. Give it some time before judging them however. Only new projects being initiated now or in the near future will have the full benefit of the security edict, and they will take time to hit the streets.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/315/10194#10194
Inaccuracies and crazy talk 2002-01-28
Anonymous
Results, Not Resolutions 2002-01-28
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus