, SecurityFocus 2000-05-10
Love Letter worm was an "utter, abject failure" of industry, says one Congressman. Industry blames liberal judges.
Expand all |
Post comment
There IS a magic bullet, common sense.
2000-05-11
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
There IS a magic bullet, common sense.
2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Obviously Congress's House Science Committe isn't familar with something called Civil Rights
2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Maybe Microsoft should be Sued for sloppy security
2000-05-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Do you honestly think that heuristics could have detected this thing?
2000-05-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

What I would like to point out is that any multi-user-Unix-like system is NOT intrinsically more secure in this case. All the access the worm would need would be to the user's local address book. A bash shell script attached to an email could easily do just the same as ILOVEYOU. In fact it's possible to argue that such a virus could do MORE harm on a *nix once executed. It wouldn't need the user to have a specific e-mail program. There are more ways and easier ways for a script to find "interesting" addresses to mail itself to (e.g. /etc/passwd), and the script could obviously just use sendmail regardless of what e-mail-package the user received it in.
Of course such a worm targeted at *nix systems is unlikely to pop up, and would probably spread less rampantly, for several reasons:
- *nix systems are less common than MS systems by several orders of magnitude.
- The average *nix user is more experienced than the average MS user by several orders of magnitude. Most of them would probably even read the script.
But if 95 % of the John Doe's out there used e.g. Linux, I'm quite sure we'd see a similar worm targeted at them.
yt,
Gaute Lund
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/32/1881#1881