Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Lawmakers slam anti-virus biz
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2000-05-10

Love Letter worm was an "utter, abject failure" of industry, says one Congressman. Industry blames liberal judges.

Comments Mode:
Virus? 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Virus? 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Not a virus, a feature! 2000-05-12
Anonymous
Well. the industry is *sort* of right.... 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
laws 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
laws 2000-05-12
Anonymous
There IS a magic bullet, common sense. 2000-05-11
Anonymous (3 replies)
There IS a magic bullet, common sense. 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
There IS a magic bullet, common sense. 2000-05-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
not a/v politics to blame 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Put the blame where it belongs 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Put the blame where it belongs 2000-05-11
Anonymous
The US Gov. CAN'T be that stupid! 2000-05-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
The US Gov. CAN'T be that stupid! 2000-05-11
Anonymous
This is ridiculous! 2000-05-11
Anonymous
Valuable Employees 2000-05-11
Anonymous
Listen to the panel 2000-05-11
Anonymous
who does he think he is? 2000-05-11
Anonymous
Virus? 2000-05-11
Anonymous
Civil Rights 2000-05-12
Anonymous
Awareness 2000-05-12
Anonymous
Misinformed public 2000-05-12
Anonymous
Try this... 2000-05-12
Anonymous
oh my heavens 2000-05-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
oh my heavens 2000-05-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
oh my heavens 2000-05-15
<ntaddict (at) hotmail (dot) com [email concealed]>
Anti-Virus companies to blame? please 2000-05-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
"figured out a way to block this" 2000-05-12
Anonymous
Criticism of AV industry and Microsoft are both justified 2000-05-17
Anonymous
I used to work in the Anti-Virus industry (for about six years) and when Microsoft brought out the VBScript and Scripting Host concepts I could see both the good and bad sides...

'ILuvYou', and other VBScript 'viruses' that are currently circulating, are only the tip of the iceberg. The threat of VBScript-based viruses/worms is that introduction of polymorphism to the virus code will render (dare I say ALL?) current concepts in "anti-virus" software redundant.

As the virus/worm is in text form, and interpreted by the Scripting Host so as to become active, the use of conventional virus-scanning techniques will NOT work as they rely on "tried-and-true" methods such as search strings...

For example, Consider the following VBScript code snippet which is contained in a current virus:

dim octa

dim octb

dim octc

dim octd

Now consider this snippet - in which one variable name has been changed throught the virus text file:

dim octa

dim octb

dim octc

dim octe

According to my tests on a number of current AV products (and their latest virus-signature files) the first file is detected but the second one is not...

Would the AV indusytry therefore identify the second file as a variant? or a new virus?

But what if the virus included a simple polymorphism routine that changes the names of all the "variables" within the virus/worm script during the replication procedure... The above code snippet could become

dim V09GH

dim AAB09

dim HD3ED

dim QJ832

And each time the virus spreads its text will be different even though its functionality will be exactly the same. How will the anti-virus software fair? It will fail on all counts!!!

Anti-Virus companies have been warned - they were warned last year with Melissa, They were warned this year with "ILuvYou" and its variants.

The AV companies need to re-develop their technology to cater for this style of virus/worm OR Microsoft will need to re-engineer all their software to be less virus/worm friendly and possibly remove the presence of all forms of "scripting hosts" from all versions of Windows.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/32/1938#1938







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus