Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2002-03-25

Should hack-and-tell intruders who warn companies about security holes do time with hardened criminals? Security experts probe the ethics of hacking.

Comments Mode:
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-26
Anonymous (2 replies)
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-26
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-26
Surreal (1 replies)
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-26
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-26
Robert P (1 replies)
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-26
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-27
Martin
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-27
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-27
Ichinin (Ichinin (at) suespammers (dot) org [email concealed], TEXT messages only NO HTML)
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-27
To the armchair sec analysts
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-27
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-27
Andy Richmond
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-27
Patrick
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-28
Dimitri Sinchovich
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-28
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-28
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-29
Snagnbytz
NYT Should Prosecute... 2002-03-29
Brian Powell (1 replies)
NYT Should Prosecute... 2002-04-01
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-31
Anonymous
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-03-31
Anonymous
Damn the man! 2002-04-01
RK2K
What else did he get in to? 2002-04-01
CrazyNetworkGuy
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-04-02
Hamster1
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-04-02
Scorp
Lets face it, Security Analysts and Hackers share the same culture. Many Security Analysts themselves started out as hackers so of course they are going to feel sympathy for hackers. But that aside. Besides it being against the law, what is wrong with non-malicious hacks. People will say it is similar to a burglar breakign into your house and the sense of privacy people lose when that occurs. But your physical home is very different then a computer network. for one, your home is a personal place, Lamo's targets are all corporations. it's not like you'd feel all that violated if your office building got broken into. Also, with a burgarly there is the realization that you may not physically be safe, this can be very distressing. With a non-malicious computer hack there is no threat of real harm only the realization that your information may not be safe, but when your responsible for the information a company such as Lamo's targets are maybe I feel it is a good thing for them to realize they need to be up their security.

-Scorp, if you have any comments feel free to contact me theomlet (at) comcast (dot) net [email concealed]

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/358/11563#11563
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-04-02
John in Virginia
After reading these posts... 2002-04-02
Robert Perriero (1 replies)
I agree completely 2002-04-02
Scorp
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-04-02
John P.
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-04-02
Anonymous Lady
Panel Debates Hacker Amnesty 2002-04-03
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus