, SecurityFocus 2003-04-15
SAN FRANCISCO--Should corporations hire known hackers with criminal records to test and secure their networks?
Expand all |
Post comment
Debate: Should You Hire a Hacker?
2003-04-16
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Debate: Should you hire a convicted Hacker?
2003-04-16
Fantom Code (2 replies)
Fantom Code (2 replies)
Debate: Should You Hire a Hacker?
2003-04-17
Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy <dmitriy.kropivnitskiy (at) citigroup (dot) com [email concealed]>
Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy <dmitriy.kropivnitskiy (at) citigroup (dot) com [email concealed]>
Debate: Should You Hire a Hacker?
2003-04-17
dmk (at) rarescience (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)
dmk (at) rarescience (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)

Winkler makes a judgment call on Mitnick. As the employer, he has the right to do so. I think he is ignoring Mitnick paid for his indiscretions and his youthful hackers did not. So how are they more "repentant"?
In my estimate the best test of a safe's security is to hire a safe cracker, not ask the designer of the safe.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/3982/19348#19348