, SecurityFocus 2000-07-07
A mysterious California company is sweeping the net for live hosts, and touching off alarms around the world.
Expand all |
Post comment
Anyone care to share the source IP?
2000-07-07
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
IP address range?
2000-07-07
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
IP address range?
2000-07-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
They ARE scanning .GOV
2000-07-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
If Exodus is allowing/supporting this, why not block them as well?
2000-07-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
What can they really learn?
2000-07-07
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Scanned In Seattle
2000-07-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
This is the same as a person knocking at your front door, Nothing illegal here.
2000-07-11
Jeff Deitz <jeffd (at) vsp (dot) com [email concealed]> (3 replies)
Jeff Deitz <jeffd (at) vsp (dot) com [email concealed]> (3 replies)
This is the same as a person knocking at your front door, Nothing illegal here.
2000-07-11
Anonymous
Anonymous
This is the same as a person knocking at your front door, Nothing illegal here.
2000-07-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
This is the same as a person knocking at your front door, Nothing illegal here.
2000-07-13
Anonymous
Anonymous
time domain reflectometer
2000-07-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)

> ls -d quova.com
[AUTH50.NS.UU.NET]
$ORIGIN quova.com.
@ 1D IN SOA ns1 hostmaster (
2000062901 ; serial
1H ; refresh
15M ; retry
2W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
1D IN NS ns1
1D IN MX 10 mailhost
1D IN MX 20 imail
1D IN MX 30 mail.DIGIWEB.com.
1D IN A 208.37.145.34
pophost 1D IN A 208.37.145.37
cgi 1D IN A 206.161.225.46
fw 1D IN CNAME @
mailhost 1D IN A 208.37.145.36
mail 1D IN CNAME mailhost
www 1D IN A 205.177.226.233
chat 1D IN A 206.161.237.88
ns1 1D IN A 208.37.145.35
imail 1D IN A 207.226.255.43
ftp 1D IN A 64.41.164.58
@ 1D IN SOA ns1 hostmaster (
2000062901 ; serial
1H ; refresh
15M ; retry
2W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/56/2393#2393