Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Update: MS Battles Outlook Bug
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2000-07-19

Upgrading Microsoft Explorer fixes a newly discovered hole in Outlook that threatens email-borne havoc.

Comments Mode:
Microslow 2000-07-19
Anonymous
Still using outlook? 2000-07-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
Still using outlook? 2000-07-20
Anonymous (2 replies)
Still using outlook? 2000-07-20
Anonymous (3 replies)
Still using outlook? 2000-07-21
Anonymous
Still using outlook? 2000-07-23
Anonymous (3 replies)
Still using outlook? 2000-07-24
Anonymous
Still using outlook? 2000-07-25
Anonymous
Re: Still using outlook? 2005-09-08
Roach
Still using outlook? 2000-07-24
Anonymous
Still using outlook? 2000-07-24
Anonymous
Still using outlook? 2000-07-21
Anonymous
Shame to Microsoft 2000-07-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Shame to Microsoft 2000-07-21
Anonymous
Micro?? 2000-07-19
Anonymous
Easy to use 2000-07-20
Anonymous
Server Filtering 2000-07-20
Eric Andry <eric (at) wincom (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
Server Filtering 2000-07-24
Anonymous
Is the cure worse than the problem? 2000-07-20
Anonymous (2 replies)
Is the cure worse than the problem? 2000-07-21
Anonymous (1 replies)
Is the cure worse than the problem? 2000-07-21
Eric Andry <eric (at) wincom (dot) net [email concealed]> (1 replies)
A cure that tells you to use another product. Lets see... M$ Outlook comes with the Office Suite(s), which is sapposed to be purchased. Outlook Express is Free as long as you don't take it apart, look at it funny, talk behind it's back.. Standard M$ agreement. So thier fix is to change from a purchased product to a somewhat free product (I think at the bottom the the License Agreement, it states your soul belongs to William Gates, though I might be wrong), Losing the extra functionality of plain old Outlook. Hmmm.. This doesn't sound much like fixing as it does assimilating. Getting rid of Purchased software in exchange for free software can be good at time (I'd drop any WinXX box and install any of the BSD's , Linux, even Slowaris x86 ) But the good free products aren't coming outta M$'s Developers Corner. The Unix flavours I mentioned earlier are all free and don't take away functionality from Servers or Workstations anymore. A Linux workstation or two will co-exist nicely in a MS Dominant Network. (Even though the Network Admin should be dragged out and beatin (In my Opinion)). Linux, BSD's, and Solaris x86 all are capable now of performing the same tasks as Win Workstations, and have several additional features, some easy to use for even the now so computer literate (Unless they actually want to get down and dirty and out of X) with less bloat the thier M$ Rival. The Unix's have always beat the snot outta NT as far as servers go, they always will. I don't care if you can get Certified by MS and be considered a System Administrator and have a job paying X amount.. When it comes down to it, when something goes wrong, when security has been breached, how much can the person do. He's probably most prepared to handle the cleaning up of the breakin, since an M$ fix is usually unistall, re-install and start from scratch. Oh well... Just Me Bitching.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/62/2639#2639
Is the cure worse than the problem? 2000-07-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
I guess a good solution for MS is... 2000-07-20
Anonymous (2 replies)
I guess a good solution for MS is... 2000-07-21
Anonymous (1 replies)
Its so easy to use! 2000-07-21
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus