Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Lamo surrenders, is released
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2003-09-09

SACRAMENTO, Calif.--A federal judge ordered Adrian Lamo released to his parents' custody Tuesday afternoon, but barred the hacker from using computers, and ordered him to obtain full-time employment pending trial.

Comments Mode:
to Adrian 2003-09-09
jaryd (1 replies)
Good Luck Adrian 2003-09-12
Luke
Lamo set to surrender Tuesday 2003-09-09
Anonymous (3 replies)
Lamo set to surrender Tuesday 2003-09-10
Anonymous
Stupidity of Government 2003-09-18
? T-Rex ?
Re: Lamo set to surrender Tuesday 2006-02-14
Anonymous
I feel much safer now. 2003-09-09
The 420 Zodiac (4 replies)
I feel much safer now. 2003-09-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
I feel much safer now. 2003-09-12
Anonymous
I feel much safer now. 2003-09-10
Anonymous
I feel much safer now. 2003-09-10
Anonymous
safer how 2003-09-10
izzy (1 replies)
safer how 2003-09-11
Ryan Lambert
Lamo released, banned from computers 2003-09-10
penfold (1 replies)
Total BS 2003-09-10
Dick Jiggler (1 replies)
no guy 2003-09-10
iz
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
D (1 replies)
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
Anonymous
$300,000 in database research charges 2003-09-10
The420Zodiac (4 replies)
$300,000 in database research charges 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
$300,000 in database research charges 2003-09-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
$300,000 in database research charges 2003-09-12
Anonymous
> Has Lamo or his attourney (does he even have one?) indicated these are trumped up fees?

Yes, he is denying it vigorously, at the same time as admitting everything else. In fact the very next article on Security Focus is about it.

The NYT is claiming that, in completely separate incidents over a period of several *months* before, during and after the now infamous public demonstration of NYT's security holes, Lamo made over 3,000 LexisNexis searches, many of them for financial information from which he might expect to profit. If the allegation is proved, it puts a totally different light on Lamo's character and motivations.

On the other hand, the claim that 3,000 searches would be charged at $100 each has been widely ridiculed, even by NYT journalists. According to LexisNexis itself, the charge for a single search ranges from $3 to a maximum of $12.

$300,000 just happens to be enough to increase the offence from a fairly minor one to a much more serious category. NYT is also attempting to pursue Lamo for the rather large fees of the consultants they brought in to fix the problems he pointed out to them.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/6907/22234#22234
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
apex_predator (1 replies)
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
Anonymous
uhm relax 2003-09-10
Anonymous (5 replies)
uhm relax 2003-09-10
Anonymous
uhm relax 2003-09-10
ferretzero
you said it yourself 2003-09-10
Anonymous
uhm relax 2003-09-11
apex_predator (1 replies)
uhm relax 2003-09-11
Anonymous
uhm relax 2003-09-18
? T-Rex ?
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
Anonymous
People want blood to feel safer 2003-09-10
DarkCrypt0
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-11
Anonymous
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
Anonymous
Lamo (No Threat) 2003-09-10
Anonymous
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-10
rleroy (at) avantages (dot) com [email concealed]
Disagreement 2003-09-10
Krash (1 replies)
Disagreement 2003-09-11
Ryan Lambert
Way to go FBI!! 2003-09-11
Jagdwulfe (2 replies)
Way to go FBI!! 2003-09-11
apex_predator (1 replies)
Way to go FBI!! 2003-09-12
Jagdwulfe
New Paper Headline: 2003-09-11
[.FU.] Cyber Neophites (2 replies)
New Paper Headline: 2003-09-12
Ryan Lambert
Lamo surrenders, is released 2003-09-13
Jagdwulfe







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus