Lamo denies $300,000 database hack

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2003-09-10

Days before going public with his penetration of the New York Times internal network last year, hacker Adrian Lamo created five new user accounts with the LexisNexis database service under the Times corporate account, which he used to rack up $300,000 in charges over the following three months, a federal complaint in New York charges.

Expand all | Post comment

Lamo denies $300,000 ego-surfing spree 2003-09-10
Anonymous

Lamo 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Easy target 2003-09-11
Anonymous

Lamo the polishing rag. 2003-09-11
Got Worm?

Lamo denies $300,000 ego-surfing spree 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Lamo denies $300,000 ego-surfing spree 2003-09-12
Anonymous

Lamo denies $300,000 database spree 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Is Maurice Clarett 2003-09-11
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-11
drg (3 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-11
The 420 Zodiac (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-12
Wckd (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-12
Anonymous (2 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-14
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-18
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-12
Anonymous (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-13
Jagdwulfe (2 replies)

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-15
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-17
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-21
Anonymous

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Mike (2 replies)

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous

Did you not read the whole article? HE DID TELL THE COMPANY.

And currently there is nothing to prove that he created passwords, or ran any 'expensive' applications. Only the NYT's word.

Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Doesn't it seem odd that no one else has ever claimed damages from Lamo's actions?? Don't assume that the NYT is telling the truth. Wait for the proof.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/6934/22218#22218

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous

The difference between my network and yours..... 2003-09-11
Anonymous Hacker Supporter (3 replies)

The difference between my network and yours..... 2003-09-11
Anonymous

The difference between my network and yours..... 2003-09-17
Sunfire (1 replies)

The difference between my network and yours..... 2003-09-18
phaust

The difference between my network and yours..... 2003-09-18
Anonymous

breaking into someone's house analogy doesn't work !!! 2003-09-11
Anonymous (2 replies)

breaking into someone's house analogy doesn't work !!! 2003-09-12
The 420 Zodiac

breaking into someone's house analogy doesn't work !!! 2003-09-12
An idiot like the one that posted before me.

Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous (2 replies)

Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous (4 replies)

Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous