Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Lamo denies $300,000 database hack
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2003-09-10

Days before going public with his penetration of the New York Times internal network last year, hacker Adrian Lamo created five new user accounts with the LexisNexis database service under the Times corporate account, which he used to rack up $300,000 in charges over the following three months, a federal complaint in New York charges.

Comments Mode:
Lamo 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Easy target 2003-09-11
Anonymous
Lamo the polishing rag. 2003-09-11
Got Worm?
Lamo denies $300,000 ego-surfing spree 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lamo denies $300,000 database spree 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Is Maurice Clarett 2003-09-11
Anonymous
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-11
drg (3 replies)
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-11
The 420 Zodiac (1 replies)
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-12
Wckd (1 replies)
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-14
Anonymous
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-18
Anonymous
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-21
Anonymous
Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Mike (2 replies)
Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous
Be careful how you stereotype groups of people.

A lot of people who are out here supporting Adrian, are doing so to ensure that he gets a fair trial. Something that has been missing from many hacker cases.

Also, there needs to be some reforms in our laws. It is ridiculous to have the same punishment handed down to someone like Adrian, that is given to someone who hacks in and steals credit cards numbers for fraudulent purposes.

The government seems to be hacker hunting, probably to justify some budget that they received by overinflating the terrorist threat due to hackers. Are you sure you're totally clean and nothing you have on your system could be construed as "questionable?"

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/6934/22220#22220
breaking into someone's house analogy doesn't work !!! 2003-09-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
breaking into someone's house analogy doesn't work !!! 2003-09-12
An idiot like the one that posted before me.
Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous (4 replies)
Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous
Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous
Moral question. 2003-09-12
Anonymous
Moral question. 2003-09-15
MartinX
Moral question. 2003-09-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Moral question. 2003-09-17
Gregory T. Buckhead
Of course he should be tried 2003-09-12
BigTymer-
Adrian & me 2003-09-12
kepi blanc (1 replies)
Adrian & me 2003-09-17
lowtec
hacks and hacks 2003-09-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
hacks and hacks 2003-09-17
A nony mouse
He does not deserve a punishment 2003-09-15
HaCkGhosT
Lamo = Your Fiendly Neighborhood SPIDERMAN 2003-09-17
A nony mouse (1 replies)
Pssh. 2003-09-18
Phreak







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus