Lamo denies $300,000 database hack

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2003-09-10

Days before going public with his penetration of the New York Times internal network last year, hacker Adrian Lamo created five new user accounts with the LexisNexis database service under the Times corporate account, which he used to rack up $300,000 in charges over the following three months, a federal complaint in New York charges.

Expand all | Post comment

Lamo denies $300,000 ego-surfing spree 2003-09-10
Anonymous

Lamo 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Easy target 2003-09-11
Anonymous

Lamo the polishing rag. 2003-09-11
Got Worm?

Lamo denies $300,000 ego-surfing spree 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Lamo denies $300,000 ego-surfing spree 2003-09-12
Anonymous

Lamo denies $300,000 database spree 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Is Maurice Clarett 2003-09-11
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-11
drg (3 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-11
The 420 Zodiac (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-12
Wckd (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-12
Anonymous (2 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-14
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-18
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-12
Anonymous (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-13
Jagdwulfe (2 replies)

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-15
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried - Enough analogies! 2003-09-17
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)

Of course he should be tried 2003-09-21
Anonymous

Of course he should be tried

There is a reason Lamo was arrested.

There is a reason there is a law against his actions.

You want to discourage folks from rummaging around your personal belongings whether they belong to a person or a corporation.

There is a reason it is called private property; invasion of property, theft by taking; theft by deception. You don't want to encourage that behavior.

Folks get together, form a group a government, note rules and provide punishment for rule breakers to encourage civil obedience, public harmony and penalize destructive behavior. yeah its not perfect.

Just because the victim was sloppy, over-exposed, not popular doesn't give someone the freedom to victimize.

come-on; 3000 lexus-nexus inquiries for friends, family and fellow employees! That's not proof of concept, that's taking advantage of a exposure.

No matter how you coat it;

it still boils down to theft.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/6934/22447#22447

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous (1 replies)

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Mike (2 replies)

Lamo denies $300,000 database hack 2003-09-11
Anonymous