Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Verisign's 'SiteFinder' finds privacy hullabaloo
Deborah Radcliff, SecurityFocus 2003-09-19

Privacy advocates have joined the chorus of critics of Verisign's "SiteFinder," which on Monday began directing mistyped dot-com and dot-net e-mail and Web addresses to a search site operated by the company and Overture.com, a Pasadena, Calif.-based advertising company that brands itself as a search engine.

Comments Mode:
Fighting SiteFinder 2003-09-21
bl0rf
a way to make VS change their minds 2003-09-22
L (1 replies)
a way to make VS change their minds - maybe 2003-09-25
Roger
Kind of nice, but you will probably want to generate it in CGI or Javascript so it can change frequently; however make sure it isn't on a page that is the target of a form with method GET, or they will get to log the form contents.

And of course they will still get a listing of everyone who's hitting your page, identifying the source of the requests through the REFERRER value.

It might be more effective to distribute a little app which just generates and sends GETs to bogus domains, using bogus header information, and ignores the results. Do it from behind a proxy which serves a large number of users, and generate REMOTE_ADDR which is plausible for that proxy; thart way you help to protect the privacy of all the users of that service. A few thousand guys each sending a few hundred kinda plausible requests a day should be enough to corrupt their database.

Of course with such a lightweight process even a dial-up machine could actually generate close to a hundred thousand requests per hour. It would be an interesting question legally if enough load was generated to slow the performance of sitefinder; are you attacking sitefinder, or are they causing it to themselves by hijacking your traffic? 8^)

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/7009/22539#22539
Verisign's 'SiteFinder' finds privacy hullabaloo 2003-09-24
Hugo van der Kooij (2 replies)
Not their first sleazy tactic. 2003-09-29
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus