AtStake jilts Phiber Optik

AtStake jilts Phiber Optik
Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus 2000-09-01

The corporation formerly known as the L0pht courts Mark Abene, balks at his hacker past.

Expand all | Post comment

Their debt has been paid 2000-09-01
Alascom (paw (at) paw (dot) org [email concealed]) (3 replies)

Agreed, this is crap! 2000-09-01
BLKMGK (1 replies)

This makes me sick to my stomach 2000-09-02
Termy (at) ecad (dot) org [email concealed]

Their debt has been paid (child molester babysits kids) 2000-09-03
mujahadin (at) hushmail (dot) com [email concealed]

A presidents past 2000-09-05
f3d

Hyprocracy and prejudice 2000-09-01
Ichinin (Ichinin (at) suespammers (dot) org [email concealed])

Kevin, what the hell? 2000-09-01
Dr SuSE

More than that's unfair... 2000-09-01
uucpbrain (1 replies)

but they didn't have to be assholes about it 2000-09-01
anonymouse

restoration of civil rights 2000-09-01
grayarea (at) html (dot) net [email concealed] (1 replies)

restoration of civil rights 2000-09-01
mb (at) gti (dot) net [email concealed]

Ha 2000-09-01
Z0mn

What do you mean, they didn't know?!? 2000-09-01
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]>

So what?!? 2000-09-01
H Carvey <keydet89 (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]>

Is all about the money 2000-09-01
Legion

Why *did* Space Rogue leave @Stake 2000-09-01
CString (1 replies)

Why *did* Space Rogue leave @Stake 2000-09-05
Space Rogue

If i have a computer Company, I would be gald to hire Phiber Optics 2000-09-01
Eksploit

Why should @Stake hire him? 2000-09-01
livid (1 replies)

Why should @Stake hire him? (why shouldn't they?) 2000-09-02
hal0joneZ (1 replies)

Why should @Stake hire him? (why shouldn't they?) 2000-09-04
joe mama (1 replies)

Why should @Stake be willing to hire people with convictions? 2000-09-04
Halo (1 replies)

Why should @Stake be willing to hire people with convictions? 2000-09-05

heh... lamers... 2000-09-02
DAQ42 (2 replies)

he got caught. it's that simple. you have to wonder about someone who is supposed to be skilled at "hacking" or "phreaking" or "cracking" and they got caught. i would have to agree with the "big, evil, hypocritic corporation" on this one. the guys at @stake weren't caught, they didn't make mistakes, they earned thier 3|337 status. that means they can snub whoever they want, even other hackers. blah,blah,blah - flame on if you want to but if you want to play the game you better be good enough to cover yourself.

DAQ42

if you hate me, hate me for the right reasons

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/79/3236#3236

shrug 2000-09-02

re: heh... lamers... 2000-09-02
medivh

The "clean room" stupidity..... 2000-09-02
Mike Roadancer (2 replies)

Hypocrisy 2000-09-02
The Dodger (1 replies)

Hypocrisy 2000-09-02
Me

re: The 'clean room' 2000-09-02
medivh

People don?t change, they become who they rilley are. 2000-09-02
Craig Borchardt

The l0pht goes soft 2000-09-02
servertr0uble

@stake = more uptight than Ernst & Young 2000-09-02

Amen 2000-09-02
marahnemo

I can Recognise this hypocracy in myself 2000-09-03
Dr phun

Hiring Hackers 2000-09-03
Graham Burgess