Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Comcast targets Internet `abusers' but won't reveal limits
Matthew Fordahl, The Associated Press 2004-01-29

By all accounts, George Nussbaum demands a lot from his Internet connection. He streams video and transfers large files from his office. His family downloads movie trailers and his stepson listens to and buys music online.

Comments Mode:
Comcast targets Internet `abusers' but won't reveal limits 2004-01-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Comcast targets Internet `abusers' but won't reveal limits 2004-01-30
Phil Karn (1 replies)
Comcast targets Internet `abusers' but won't reveal limits 2004-01-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
It's not a matter of the type of data that's being transferred but the amount. Traffic is not free. ISPs have to pay for the traffic to someone else and even if it stays in house, downloading a terabyte in 1 month is just obscene!

If the cost of this bandwidth were passed onto the consumer, the traffic would drop drastically!

Of course DSL is going to say they don't have any limits. Firstly their upstream is extremely low and the downstream still in some situations doesn't compare to cable and is slower. In Canada, cable is quite often close to a 10mbit connection downstream for residential users. Compare this to the DSL connections that is only 1.5mbit and with an upgrade 3mbit and 5mbit but by this time you're at the business package and paying extra.

When it boils down to it, what're you downloading that's worth 1 terabyte of data? If it's legit then you can probably afford to switch to a business package that'd accomodate your high traffic needs. If however it's illegal, chances are you won't pay the extra $$$ for the extra bandwidth mostly because you're already not shelling out the extra $$$ for the illegal stuff you're downloading.

Granted, Comcast' policy of just disabling users without some prior knowledge at all is not customer friendly however when 1 person is transferring terabytes worth of data, i say kick 'em off the service! Tiered bandwidth for all, pay for what you use!

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/7940/24598#24598
Not only cable companies, dsl too. 2004-01-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Not only cable companies, dsl too. 2004-01-30
Anonymous (3 replies)
Think about the numbers 2004-01-30
Anonymous (3 replies)
Re: Think about the numbers 2004-01-30
Anonymous
Think about the numbers 2004-01-30
Anonymous
Think about the numbers 2004-01-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Think about the numbers 2004-02-02
Anonymous
Cox Cable's byte caps - what a JOKE 2004-01-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Comcast targets Internet `abusers' but won't reveal limits 2004-01-30
peter (at) kickit (dot) to [email concealed]
The answer is simple... 2004-01-30
Anonymous (3 replies)
The REAL answer is simple... 2004-01-30
Anonymous
Comcast not alone........ 2004-01-30
Anonymous
Capping idea came from Australia. 2004-01-30
Anonymous
Stand up for your rights! 2004-01-30
Angry Comcast Customer (1 replies)
Re: Stand up for your rights! 2007-01-27
Anonymous
DSL not without similar issues 2004-01-30
Anonymous
Comcast non support 2004-01-30
Anonymous
ConsumerAffairs.com Story 2004-02-02
Michael Piper







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus