, SecurityFocus 2004-01-30
Two years after its hopeful launch, a U.S.-backed research project aimed at drawing skilled eyeballs to the thankless task of open-source security auditing is prepared to throw in the towel.
Expand all |
Post comment
DARPA-funded Linux security hub withers
2004-02-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

There is one counter-example: OpenBSD. It'd be interesting to learn why the Sardonix project failed, while OpenBSD has been doing code reviews and continues to do so.
So, if you want secure software, make sure the original developers (and their follow-ons) know how to develop secure software. Open source software does get "many eyeballs", but primarily from various developers, not "security code review experts". Proprietary software gets very little code review (generally only the original developer). There are books that tell developers how to write secure code, such as at http://www.dwheeler.com/secure-programs - but they don't help if developers don't read them.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/7947/24718#24718