"I think there's an awful lot of presumptions going on about who's downloading these files and for what reason," Schultz says -- an attorney or a journalists might download software in an investigation, for example. "Even if it's the case that the people who download this are trying to get illegal files, two wrongs don't make a right."

Indeed two wrongs dont make a right, and in this case there could very well be innocent people being posted on that site without being able to defend themselves..

I didn't read anything about how the website tracks people who have been tricked into downloading and executing the software under a different name or description, but I am going to go and read up about it a little more. If someone can obtain and reverse engineer the software to attack the creators site, then the sky really is the limit on how much they can retaliate. Changing details is something people have been doing since day one where file sharing is concearned.

Just as a very poor example lets say you go looking for something like Telnet.exe because you want a telnet client, and you are looking for a freeware one. If you find a match saying "Telnet.exe Desc:Free telnet client" and you download and execute this which in turn reports you as being a software pirate.. Your going to feel MORE than a little violated.

Of course, as I said, I'm sure they have already thought of this as it still happens and has happened since the birth of file sharing.

PS: I don't use file sharing software, and this is a perfect example of why. The 'cure' now seems to be as bad as the disease. To me this is another nail in the PTPFS coffin...

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/8279/25426#25426