, SecurityFocus 2004-03-18
A pair of coders nurturing a deep antipathy for software pirates set off a controversy Thursday when they went public with a months-old experiment to trick file sharers into running a Trojan horse program that chastises users and reports back to a central server.
Expand all |
Post comment
Good for them
2004-03-19
nosebreaker.com (1 replies)
nosebreaker.com (1 replies)
Good for them? - Questionable Ethics
2004-03-20
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Questionable Ethics? it's everywhere
2004-03-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
You all might think it's all fun and games..............
2004-03-20
neb (3 replies)
neb (3 replies)
You all might think it's all fun and games..............
2004-03-21
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Don't blame real virus coders cause if you have real copies of Windows then you are fully patched!
2004-03-21
Geist (4 replies)
Geist (4 replies)
blame real virus coders cause if you have real copies of Windows then you are still not fully patched!
2004-03-21
Anonymous
Anonymous
Don't blame real virus coders cause if you have real copies of Windows then you are fully patched!
2004-03-22
Anonymous
Anonymous
We like to call that "Entrapment" in the legal world
2004-03-22
Reuben (4 replies)
Reuben (4 replies)

As far as laws being broken, who really cares? They aren't causing any harm, except in the way of posting the IP information for each user. If they only gathered anonymous statistics about the programs usage, this would be OK in my book.
I don't think anyone really pays attention to those EUA, so even if one was included, I don't think that would really make a difference. Personally, anything downloaded off of a file sharing network should be examined for virii and your firewall should be up to prevent information from being sent over your network connection. If the file was clean, which only means it is not a wide-spread virus, then you could still run the program with minimal risk while keeping your privacy since your firewall would have detected its attempts to communicate to the outside world.
The bigger question here is, "Why weren't the users running a firewall that monitored both incoming and outgoing traffic?"
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/8279/25437#25437