, SecurityFocus 2004-05-25
To the Area 51 buffs who travel to the Nevada desert in the hopes of catching a glimpse of unexplained lights in the sky or to bask in the mythic allure of the region, 58-year-old Chuck Clark is almost as much a part of the local color as the Black Mailbox.
Expand all |
Post comment
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-26
Anonymous (15 replies)
Anonymous (15 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-26
billy (4 replies)
billy (4 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-26
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-28
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Stupid is as stupid does
2004-05-26
Sgt_Jake (5 replies)
Sgt_Jake (5 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-26
billy (2 replies)
billy (2 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-26
Anonymous (9 replies)
Anonymous (9 replies)
Area 51 hackers dig up trouble
2004-05-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
gravy train
2004-05-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
gravy train
2004-05-26
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
sensors were on public land
2004-05-26
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
a thougtful replie to: sensors were on public land
2004-05-26
Anonymous? (1 replies)
Anonymous? (1 replies)
sensors were on public land
2004-05-26
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Rubbish on public lands
2004-05-27
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
The Military is not obligated to tell you squat!
2004-05-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Military is not obligated to tell you squat!
2004-05-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
the military is obligated to fix its problems, not shoot the whistleblower
2004-06-01
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Government vs. the Military
2004-05-27
Anonymous Coward (2 replies)
Anonymous Coward (2 replies)

> Which of them do you think is protecting our current military?
Erm, atomic weapon details, nerve gas production, anthrax experiments (abandoned), long range rocketry, 2nd half of Shannon's information theory paper,
> How many of them do you think are protecting someone's personal agenda or dirty little secrets?
From WWII? Very few! As WWII historiography has shown, classification is an effective way of protecting information if and only if all those privy to the secret believe earnestly in keeping it. If something is classified for an immoral purpose, the chance of a leak is very high. Consequently when people want something private forgotten, they burn the documents, not classify them; classification is the way to them archived until they can be safely released.
In any case, any of the guys in a position to have things "buried" would have been at least fortyish back then, so if any are still alive they're centenarians by now.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/8768/26456#26456