Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts
Patrick Gray, SecurityFocus 2004-06-28

SYDNEY, Australia--Microsoft chairman Bill Gates defended the company's handling of security patches Monday following widespread attacks on the Internet by suspected Russian organized crime gangs.

Comments Mode:
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-06-28
rastapong (1 replies)
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-06-28
Anonymous (3 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Daniel Convissor (3 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Alejandro (2 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
morning_wood (1 replies)
Gates Lies - good example 2004-07-01
Roger
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
iago (1 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Malaclypse (1 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Gates Lies 2004-06-30
Anonymous
MS Is Doing Better 2004-06-29
Anonymous
The problem isn't patching... 2004-06-29
Joseph W. Shaw, II (1 replies)
The problem isn't patching... 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Just Some guy (11 replies)
It truly amazes me how everyone is quick to "jump on the bandwagon" when it comes to anything negative about Microsoft. I guess being one of the best selling OS'es causes that.

As for the "less than 48 hours" statement, when does "Storm Linux" automaticly get it's updates? Oh yea, it doesn't. How about any of the other lesser known varieties of Linux? Oh yea, again, they don't. I know, use RedHat, or Mandrake, or another well known variety and they will, in fact Redhat's pretty good about it.

Now I know full well, that ANY Microsoft application has it's holes. YES, it is a pain in the to deal with. And, I've seen patches take OVER 2 months to be released. BUT (Big BUT) If it weren't one of the most used OS'es on the planet, and Linux (or BeOS, or any other for that matter) was, we'd begin to see people switch from exploiting windows to exploiting whatever else was popular. Unfortunately for Microsoft they are in the spotlight, NOT linux, or others.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/9004/27218#27218
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-06
Just Some Guy
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Wckd
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-02
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-06
Just some guy
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Marc
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-04
Anonymous
Linux Auto Updates 2004-07-01
Levi Aho
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-04
Anonymous
Point of Clarification: Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-07-01
http-equiv (at) excite (dot) com [email concealed]
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-07-05
PanzerPsycho (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]
It's still broken 2004-07-07
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus