Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts
Patrick Gray, SecurityFocus 2004-06-28

SYDNEY, Australia--Microsoft chairman Bill Gates defended the company's handling of security patches Monday following widespread attacks on the Internet by suspected Russian organized crime gangs.

Comments Mode:
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-06-28
rastapong (1 replies)
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-06-28
Anonymous (3 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Daniel Convissor (3 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Alejandro (2 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
morning_wood (1 replies)
Gates Lies - good example 2004-07-01
Roger
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
iago (1 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Malaclypse (1 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Gates Lies 2004-06-30
Anonymous
MS Is Doing Better 2004-06-29
Anonymous
The problem isn't patching... 2004-06-29
Joseph W. Shaw, II (1 replies)
The problem isn't patching... 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Just Some guy (11 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-06
Just Some Guy
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Wckd
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-02
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-06
Just some guy
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Marc
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Nice strawman. I always hate the, "because Windows is so big, the poor guys are more of a target". With this same arguement, we should really see far more Apache exploits. After all, it dominates the webserver market. However, you don't. "Big" may mean "more of a target", but still isn't a good enough excuse for poor programming, lack of security and lack of patches (in a reasonable amount of time).

Almost every decent/modern Linux distro can be setup to auto-update. Slackware can. Gentoo does. Redhate (err. Hat) does. Yet, the turn around for patches are less time. Let's assume your distro doesn't have a auto-update type of feature - You can _STILL_ manually download the new/secure code and install it yourself! With Windows, I'm out of luck. Simply wait for the patch, hope that it gets released before the malicous code does, and pray that the patch doesn't break anything.

Face it, when CERT recommends you to use _anything_ but the MS webbrowser, you know theres some major freaking issues.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/9004/27236#27236
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-04
Anonymous
Linux Auto Updates 2004-07-01
Levi Aho
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-04
Anonymous
Point of Clarification: Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-07-01
http-equiv (at) excite (dot) com [email concealed]
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-07-05
PanzerPsycho (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]
It's still broken 2004-07-07
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus