Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts
Patrick Gray, SecurityFocus 2004-06-28

SYDNEY, Australia--Microsoft chairman Bill Gates defended the company's handling of security patches Monday following widespread attacks on the Internet by suspected Russian organized crime gangs.

Comments Mode:
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-06-28
rastapong (1 replies)
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-06-28
Anonymous (3 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Daniel Convissor (3 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Alejandro (2 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
morning_wood (1 replies)
Gates Lies - good example 2004-07-01
Roger
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
iago (1 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-29
Malaclypse (1 replies)
Gates Lies 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Gates Lies 2004-06-30
Anonymous
MS Is Doing Better 2004-06-29
Anonymous
The problem isn't patching... 2004-06-29
Joseph W. Shaw, II (1 replies)
The problem isn't patching... 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Just Some guy (11 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-06
Just Some Guy
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Wckd
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-02
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-06
Just some guy
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Marc
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-06-30
Anonymous
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
> It truly amazes me how everyone is quick to "jump on the bandwagon" when it comes to anything negative about Microsoft. I guess being one of the best selling OS'es causes that.

Or, it could be because it's so bad...

> As for the "less than 48 hours" statement, when does "Storm Linux" automaticly get it's updates? [...]

True. But even the MS zealots agree that Gates' 48 hours claim is patent nonsense. They only release them once a month, fer chrissakes!

> Unfortunately for Microsoft they are in the spotlight, NOT linux, or others.

This lame arse excuse that MS zealots use to explain away their terrible security record, just doesn't hold water. Unlike other OSes, MS operating systems have a clear delineation between client and server versions. Their server versions are *not* the number one target when it comes to internet-visible servers. (They sometimes claim it, but again, they lie). Yet they still have more security problems even if only server versions are considered.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/9004/27242#27242
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-04
Anonymous
Linux Auto Updates 2004-07-01
Levi Aho
Anti-Microsoft FanBoys 2004-07-04
Anonymous
Point of Clarification: Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-07-01
http-equiv (at) excite (dot) com [email concealed]
Gates Defends Microsoft Patch Efforts 2004-07-05
PanzerPsycho (at) yahoo (dot) com [email concealed]
It's still broken 2004-07-07
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus