Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
A Cybersecurity Sleeping Pill
George Smith, 2002-09-23

From a White House given to dramatic warnings of electronic Pearl Harbors comes an incongruously meek national strategy. Did industry lobbyists slip someone a Mickey?

Comments Mode:
A Cybersecurity Sleeping Pill 2002-09-23
mcoke61
Is it any wonder? 2002-09-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Is it any wonder? 2002-09-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Is it any wonder? 2002-09-26
Anonymous
A Cybersecurity Sleeping Pill 2002-09-23
Dexter Eldritch
The correct posture 2002-09-24
Pirou Freek <piroufreek@safe-mail.net>
A Cybersecurity Sleeping Pill 2002-09-24
Anonymous
A Cybersecurity Sleeping Pill 2002-09-24
Anonymous
I think the thing reads like one of those horrendous "deliverables" you get when you hire a Big 4 consulting firm to come in and do an assessment.

I don't know whether it's the content derived from a template, the cheesy stock photos on almost every page (my favorite is always the guys in suits pointing at an LCD panel), the meaningless graphs and charts, or the overall lame design (lets put a neat-o matrix type graph thing in the corner and those crazy ones and zeros along the bottom of every page!), but I'm really wondering whether the Bush administration has a clue to what's going on.

I really hope that the final copy actually has content and reads like a professional paper addressing the issues we face. Clarke and Schmidt should be fired for passing off this garbage as a strategy.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/110/16551#16551
A Cybersecurity Sleeping Pill 2002-09-24
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus