Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
One Patch to Rule Them All
Tim Mullen, 2002-09-30

A recent XP security hole begs the question, do we really want Microsoft to release individual fixes for every bug?

Comments Mode:
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-09-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-08
Anonymous
Security patchs are diffrent 2002-09-30
Anonymous
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-02
Anonymous
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-01
Anonymous
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-01
Anonymous
RE: One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-01
Piroufreek
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-04
Anonymous
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-01
Anonymous
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-01
Todd Knarr
Yes, we want a la carte fixes for security holes. The problem with a mega-patch like XP SP1 is that it changes so much. It may introduce new bugs and security holes, or may just change things so that other software suddenly doesn't work or requires updates. To an admin responsible for systems that _must_ be running for the business to function, that's the stuff of nightmares. Even for a home user, it's something to be avoided. A patch targeted at a specific bug or security hole, OTOH, is much less likely to break large portions of the system, be incompatible with existing software or introduce new bugs and holes.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/112/16658#16658
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-02
security@NOdsia.SPAM.com
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-03
Darkphyber
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-03
iDENTiTY
One Patch to Rule Them All 2002-10-04
Anonymous
He should have called this article "Flame Bait"... 2002-10-09
Anonymouse (1 replies)
"Flame Bait" 2002-10-09
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus