Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't

Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't
Jon Lasser, 2002-10-09

Developers are accused of not publicizing the browser's security vulnerabilities enough. But do we really need world wide alerts for every bug?

Expand all | Post comment

Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud 2002-10-09
Twinker (3 replies)

Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud 2002-10-09
Rob John <rdrj@mindspring.com> (2 replies)

I tend to agree, every vulnerability should be disclosed, regardless of how severe or not anyone judges it to be. I find it hard to believe you would apply the same standard to Microsoft.

Lets be consistent,

Rob

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/114/16754#16754

Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud 2002-10-10
JTM

My point was.... 2002-10-10
Twinker (1 replies)

Nothing's hidden 2002-10-15
Anonymous (1 replies)

Nothing's hidden 2002-10-15
Karl

Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud 2002-10-15
Jason

Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud 2002-10-16
DaveHowe

Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-09
Chad Loder

Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-10
Jon Lasser (2 replies)

Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-11
Sam

Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-16
Serge Wroclawski

Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-10
Anonymous

Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-10
Twinker (2 replies)