Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't
Jon Lasser, 2002-10-09

Developers are accused of not publicizing the browser's security vulnerabilities enough. But do we really need world wide alerts for every bug?

Comments Mode:
Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud 2002-10-09
Twinker (3 replies)
Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud 2002-10-09
Rob John <rdrj@mindspring.com> (2 replies)
My point was.... 2002-10-10
Twinker (1 replies)
Nothing's hidden 2002-10-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Nothing's hidden 2002-10-15
Karl
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-09
Chad Loder
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-10
Jon Lasser (2 replies)
I'm not arguing *against* full disclosure. If you think that's what I was saying, please read the column again.

I'm arguing that we need to think harder about our forums, and where a particular vulnerability should be disclosed.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/114/16764#16764
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-16
Serge Wroclawski
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-10
Anonymous
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-10
Twinker (2 replies)
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-11
XandreX (1 replies)
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-14
Anonymous
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-15
Anonymous
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-12
Anonymous
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-12
Anonymous
Practice what you preach 2002-10-13
Anonymous
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-13
Anonymous
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't 2002-10-16
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus