, 2002-10-09
Developers are accused of not publicizing the browser's security vulnerabilities enough. But do we really need world wide alerts for every bug?
Expand all |
Post comment
Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud
2002-10-09
Twinker (3 replies)
Twinker (3 replies)
Cool a unix/lenix guy preaching the same stuff as M$crud
2002-10-09
Rob John <rdrj@mindspring.com> (2 replies)
Rob John <rdrj@mindspring.com> (2 replies)
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't
2002-10-10
Twinker (2 replies)
Twinker (2 replies)
Mozilla's 'Code of Silence' Isn't
2002-10-11
XandreX (1 replies)
XandreX (1 replies)

If Joe didn't bother doing anything about it for ages, and if he was storing something for friends of yours, then there might be a case for wider disclosure.
But in principle it seems reasonable to allow a *reasonably limited* amount of time for a fault to be fixed before making all details of the problem (and how to exploit it) public.
P.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/114/16781#16781