, 2002-12-02
Microsoft's security policies are getting better every day, even as a new report slams open-source competitors as security nightmares. But the easy answers aren't always the right ones.
Expand all |
Post comment
Research Supports Dumping Linux
2002-12-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Not FUD, rather Aberdeen cluelessness.
2002-12-03
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-05
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-09
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Does Research Support Dumping Linux?
2002-12-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Real professionals trust the source code ONLY
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Furthermore, I remember a CERT advisory this past summer (http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-22.html) for MS-SQL that had FIVE vulnerabilities under one advisory. The Aberdeen researchers neglected to count them as 5, rather as one instance. Did the Aberdeen experts even read through the vulnerabilities?
CA-2002-09 was a single advisory covering 10 vulnerabilities with IIS.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/127/17298#17298