, 2002-12-02
Microsoft's security policies are getting better every day, even as a new report slams open-source competitors as security nightmares. But the easy answers aren't always the right ones.
Expand all |
Post comment
Research Supports Dumping Linux
2002-12-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Not FUD, rather Aberdeen cluelessness.
2002-12-03
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-05
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-09
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Does Research Support Dumping Linux?
2002-12-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Real professionals trust the source code ONLY
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
IMHO, Microsoft should have made it secure by default, and then given the option to turn on the legacy OS support for people who really do need to interoperate with Windows NT, Windows 98, and so on. The fact that they didn't shows that they still care more about convenience than security.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/127/17304#17304