, 2002-12-02
Microsoft's security policies are getting better every day, even as a new report slams open-source competitors as security nightmares. But the easy answers aren't always the right ones.
Expand all |
Post comment
Research Supports Dumping Linux
2002-12-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Not FUD, rather Aberdeen cluelessness.
2002-12-03
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-05
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-09
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Does Research Support Dumping Linux?
2002-12-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Real professionals trust the source code ONLY
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

I just finished a rather extensive review of all the advisories from CERT for this year. (http://www.cert.org/advisories/). The totals I came up with are a little different. Unix came up with 8, Microsoft with 4, and Linux, the poster child, a whopping 3. I looked through each advisory, read which systems were affected, and checked where the issue came from. The ones I found where Linux had an issue due to its own code are:
26 - Buffer Overflow in CDE ToolTalk
25 - Integer Overflow In XDR Library
07 - Double Free bug in zlib Compression Library
Now the argument can be raised that the issues of BIND, DHCP, SSL and Kerberos should be counted against Open Source, but then can we include the AOL (02), the Macromedia JRun (13), and Yahoo Messenger (15) problems against Microsoft? Those applications do run under Microsoft windows.
I would like to see the breakdown used by the Aberdeen Group to point out how insecure Linux really is. If anyone wants a copy of my document, contact me at sfr_999@hotmail.com
Steve Robinson
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/127/17310#17310