, 2002-12-02
Microsoft's security policies are getting better every day, even as a new report slams open-source competitors as security nightmares. But the easy answers aren't always the right ones.
Expand all |
Post comment
Research Supports Dumping Linux
2002-12-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Not FUD, rather Aberdeen cluelessness.
2002-12-03
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-05
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-09
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Real professionals trust the source code ONLY
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
LOL - Sooo that would have been, what, Windows 95, 98? Ungh. Have you never heard of "new versions"? You think things do not change with new versions? Let me ask you, how much do you know about WindowsXP/2000 security? Unlike Linux, things improve over time. MS doesn't keep the same platform for 1000 years and brag about how secure it is, they innovate.
Stop making stupid comments about dated versions, this is not 1995.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/127/17333#17333