, 2002-12-02
Microsoft's security policies are getting better every day, even as a new report slams open-source competitors as security nightmares. But the easy answers aren't always the right ones.
Expand all |
Post comment
Research Supports Dumping Linux
2002-12-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Not FUD, rather Aberdeen cluelessness.
2002-12-03
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-05
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-07
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
You Linux people amaze me... or anger me I think.
2002-12-09
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
jsalter@-removethis-jrssystems.net (1 replies)
Does Research Support Dumping Linux?
2002-12-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Real professionals trust the source code ONLY
2002-12-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

"It's easier to set all sorts of odd little permissions structures up in the ACL world, but it's also easier - a LOT easier - to accidentally make something accessible (or inaccessible) that shouldn't have been, somewhere in the tangled mess of inherited permissions.": You do not know how to set permissions?
"By comparison, the simpler ownership-based methodology results in a scheme that requires more careful planning from the administrator in terms of delegating responsibility and setting up non-trivial permissions structures": What you call "trivial permission structures", we call "flexability of permission structures"; you don't need to set them if you don't need them. Too difficult for you?
"Finally, the last real set of pro-vs-con in terms of security is simply that it's a hell of a lot more difficult to effectively administer an MS server even if you ARE the administrator": Are you a Windows enterprise manager? You don't seem to know much about policies, so I'm not sure who you are getting this information from. Perhaps others like yourself?
"By comparison, the *nix world can do anything from anywhere else as easily as they can sitting right there at the desktop": Last time I checked, a couple thousand Windows machines were not that difficult to administer through AD.
"tangled spaghetti mess that requires a system reboot every time you do something": Are you making this comment based on Win95,98,NT? I haven't rebooted my W2K box in months... haven't needed to. I wonder where or where you get this stuff from, because its certainly not from experience.
"Uh... correct me if I'm wrong, but... did you just accuse a *nix of being *too easy to use*, and suggest that MS products are more difficult...?": Well, actually, yes, you seem to display a complete absence of understanding to all of the above issues; so one would believe that MS was extreamly difficult to grasp for some people.
:: boggles :: ? hmm.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/127/17364#17364