Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Strikeback, Part Deux
Tim Mullen, 2003-01-13

Why I should have the right to kill a malicious process on your machine.

Comments Mode:
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
llamatron (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Miles (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Give me a break... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Shawn Duffy (7 replies)
Give me a break... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (5 replies)
Give me a break... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Shawn Duffy (3 replies)
So... it should be illegal to not secure your computer? You need to get real... We can't make stupidity illegal but we can make it expensive... and ultimately, that's all that matters to people. unfortunately, it is not against the law to be stupid nor should it be. Ultimately, we need to get better at going after the people who DO take advantage of an insecure system.
Just because I may leave my window open doesn't mean I should get prosecuted because someone came through without invitation...
And what's wrong with the smashing stereo example? No, it doesn't happen in the real world because it is illegal and you would probably get your ass kicked... OK... let's not smash the stereo, can you just waltz into your neighbor's house and turn it off? NO. Whether or not it happens doesn't matter, what matters here is what is allowable under law, and there can be no justification for using private resources that are not your own without authorization, regardless of how stupid the admin may be...
You want to setup a public organization that is accountable to the public at large and has the right to "hack" a computer when it is actively trying to infect other machines? Fine... but we cannot allow individuals to decide on their own what punishment should exist for an attempted crime. As much as I would like to do that sometimes along with just about everyone else, we are trying to have a civilization here.

shawn

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/134/17669#17669
Give me a break... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA
Strikeback strategies CAN'T stop Nimda... 2003-01-13
Nicholas Weaver
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Valhalla
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
HalbaSus
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
pjf@thinkage.ca (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-14
Soum YnonA (1 replies)
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ronald
NIMBDA - bad example 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
k.lichtenwalder@computer.org
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
pha153
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Dan
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Striking Back 2003-01-15
Peter Schultz
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ryan Weaver
What if the Worm Closes the Door? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
Malicious "Neutralizing Agent"? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
3 strikes 2003-01-15
Jeremiah Blatz
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
CounterAttacking is your right 2003-01-15
Anonymous
They just don't get it, do they? 2003-01-15
Concerned Netizen
Your "Right" is Wrong 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Examples are flawed. 2003-01-15
Bob James
No Automation 2003-01-15
Jeff Licquia
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, accountability 2003-01-15
hobbsk@ohiou.edu
security = ethics 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
M. Durrant
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-15
Dimitris (1 replies)
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-16
Anonymous
The rule of Law 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-18
Johnny Ringo
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Rights and defenses 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-25
Anonymous
Legalities 2003-01-23
Anonymous
You are already lost 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Wrong again Timmy 2003-01-24
Unknown







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus