Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Strikeback, Part Deux
Tim Mullen, 2003-01-13

Why I should have the right to kill a malicious process on your machine.

Comments Mode:
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
llamatron (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Miles (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Give me a break... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Shawn Duffy (7 replies)
Give me a break... Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
I'm in complete agreement.

The "rights to the process" argument is absurd. A user has a right to control what is running on the machine and who has access and control over that machine, just because a worm or virus maliciously usurps that power doesn't give any other individual the right to also usurp that power to defeat it. Two wrongs do not make a right. The proper process would be to block the offending IP address if they are distrupting your network, contact the offending computer's Internet service provider and/or contact the individual who owns the offending computer if possible and have them terminate the worm.

I think this is about like proper chain of command and proper authority for control. If a terrorist group hijacks a plane or holds a building hostage, you don't break into the army's arsenal or steal police equipment to combat the terrorists. You contact the authorities and let them handle it.

Noone but the owner of the machine has the authority to change settings on it unless otherwise given to a 3rd party through agreements (such as microsoft for updates, etc). You can block the IP address, contact the ISP of the computer to disconnect it temporarily and inform the user, contact the authorities, or contact the user himself directly, but it is illegal to "hack" a computer to turn off a process... even if it's one that causes you or your business harm.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/134/17737#17737
Strikeback strategies CAN'T stop Nimda... 2003-01-13
Nicholas Weaver
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Valhalla
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
HalbaSus
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
pjf@thinkage.ca (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-14
Anonymous
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-14
Soum YnonA (1 replies)
MULLEN'S A KOOK 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ronald
NIMBDA - bad example 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
k.lichtenwalder@computer.org
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
pha153
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Dan
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Striking Back 2003-01-15
Peter Schultz
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Ryan Weaver
What if the Worm Closes the Door? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
Malicious "Neutralizing Agent"? 2003-01-15
Rick.Miller@Linux.org
3 strikes 2003-01-15
Jeremiah Blatz
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux -- vacinations 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
CounterAttacking is your right 2003-01-15
Anonymous
They just don't get it, do they? 2003-01-15
Concerned Netizen
Your "Right" is Wrong 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Examples are flawed. 2003-01-15
Bob James
No Automation 2003-01-15
Jeff Licquia
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, accountability 2003-01-15
hobbsk@ohiou.edu
security = ethics 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-15
M. Durrant
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-15
Dimitris (1 replies)
Strikeback - Think b4 you dump 2003-01-16
Anonymous
The rule of Law 2003-01-16
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-16
Anonymous
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
You shoot them...they shoot you back? 2003-01-18
Johnny Ringo
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous (2 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-21
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-22
Anonymous
Rights and defenses 2003-01-23
Dr. Vesselin Bontchev (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Rights and defenses 2003-01-25
Anonymous
Legalities 2003-01-23
Anonymous
You are already lost 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Strikeback, Part Deux 2003-01-24
Anonymous
Wrong again Timmy 2003-01-24
Unknown







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus