Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Suing Over Slammer
Mark Rasch, 2003-02-10

The Slammer worm was successful because thousands of users didn't patch Microsoft's security holes. Should we sue them all?

Comments Mode:
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-10
Anonymous
Liability and Buffer Overflows... 2003-02-10
Nicholas Weaver
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-11
Villy
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-11
keydet89@yahoo.com
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-11
Sick and tired of the excuses (5 replies)
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-11
Villy.Madsen@atcoitek.com (1 replies)
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-12
RobJ (1 replies)
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-12
Sick and tired of the excuses (1 replies)
No I do not only hold Microsoft accountable, they unfortunatly for us are what most people use. All programers should be held accountable for their code. No you can't test for every possible vulnerablity, but almost every vulnerability found to date is buffer overflow related. That is detectable and easily found when testing new code. It is still a matter of laziness and allowing the CxO to dictate how much time is spent on coding.

Using the analogy, it would be the same as the auto industry not testing a vehicles ablility to handle rough roads. They know every vehicle is going to encounter rough roads. So they test the vehicle to be sure it can handle bumps.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/141/18111#18111
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-19
Anonymous
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-14
Anonymous
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-14
Anonymous
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-18
Anonymous
Fraudulent claims of loss 2003-02-11
Fra. 219







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus