Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Suing Over Slammer
Mark Rasch, 2003-02-10

The Slammer worm was successful because thousands of users didn't patch Microsoft's security holes. Should we sue them all?

Comments Mode:
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-10
Anonymous
Liability and Buffer Overflows... 2003-02-10
Nicholas Weaver
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-11
Villy
Suing Over Slammer 2003-02-11
keydet89@yahoo.com
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-11
Sick and tired of the excuses (5 replies)
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-11
Villy.Madsen@atcoitek.com (1 replies)
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-12
RobJ (1 replies)
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-12
Sick and tired of the excuses (1 replies)
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-19
Anonymous
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-14
Anonymous
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-14
Anonymous
Is Microsoft legally responsible 2003-02-18
Anonymous
While a "licensed" user of any MS product releases MS from liability, what about network systems owners and providers who suffer real damages every time there is a bug in a product? Shouldn't they be able to collect damages from the company that makes the product?

Continuing the car analogy - does the guy walking down the street that gets run over by the Audi with the stuck gas pedal have the right to sue Audi for their product's fault? Traditionally yes. Why should software vendors be any different.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/141/18238#18238
Fraudulent claims of loss 2003-02-11
Fra. 219







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus