, 2003-02-24
Why last week's big Windows security hole is nothing more than technology press hot air.
Expand all |
Post comment
I agree completely.
2003-02-24
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Re: I agree completely.
2003-02-25
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: I agree completely.
2003-02-25
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: I agree completely, or NOT
2003-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: I agree completely.
2003-02-26
Seb (1 replies)
Seb (1 replies)
I agree completely.
2003-02-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
I agree completely - a little vauge, let's hear your arguments....
2003-02-25
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
If anyone thinks this is some new threat, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale for you
2003-02-24
3n0k (2 replies)
3n0k (2 replies)
Media Gone Mad
2003-02-25
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Linux "boot" floppy? Wow, I'm impressed.
2003-02-26
TJ Miller jr (23 replies)
TJ Miller jr (23 replies)
My Experience with The Linux
2003-02-26
Egg Troll (14 replies)
Egg Troll (14 replies)
My Experience with The Linux
2003-02-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
"Third Party Driver" ? This is slanted in the other direction
2003-02-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
"Third Party Driver" ? This is slanted in the other direction
2003-02-27
Eric Grabowski (eric@mazenet.com)
Eric Grabowski (eric@mazenet.com)
It is unfortunate...
2003-03-03
Glenn Schulz (1 replies)
Glenn Schulz (1 replies)
It is unfortunate...that you don't understand
2003-03-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
It is unfortunate...that Glenn learned security from a text book.
2003-03-05
Erik (1 replies)
Erik (1 replies)

You are assuming the user has no login procedure, that would require them to configure that as such. All users, safe mode or not, still have to log in - and their permissions remain intact.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/144/18315#18315