, 2003-02-24
Why last week's big Windows security hole is nothing more than technology press hot air.
Expand all |
Post comment
I agree completely.
2003-02-24
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Re: I agree completely.
2003-02-25
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: I agree completely.
2003-02-25
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: I agree completely, or NOT
2003-02-26
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: I agree completely.
2003-02-26
Seb (1 replies)
Seb (1 replies)
I agree completely.
2003-02-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
I agree completely - a little vauge, let's hear your arguments....
2003-02-25
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
If anyone thinks this is some new threat, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale for you
2003-02-24
3n0k (2 replies)
3n0k (2 replies)
Media Gone Mad
2003-02-25
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Linux "boot" floppy? Wow, I'm impressed.
2003-02-26
TJ Miller jr (23 replies)
TJ Miller jr (23 replies)
My Experience with The Linux
2003-02-26
Egg Troll (14 replies)
Egg Troll (14 replies)
My Experience with The Linux
2003-02-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
"Third Party Driver" ? This is slanted in the other direction
2003-02-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
"Third Party Driver" ? This is slanted in the other direction
2003-02-27
Eric Grabowski (eric@mazenet.com)
Eric Grabowski (eric@mazenet.com)
It is unfortunate...
2003-03-03
Glenn Schulz (1 replies)
Glenn Schulz (1 replies)
It is unfortunate...that you don't understand
2003-03-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
It is unfortunate...that Glenn learned security from a text book.
2003-03-05
Erik (1 replies)
Erik (1 replies)

and has been around longer than the PC. However, we've all
known that things like password-protecting the BIOS are
almost worthless, since opening the case and fiddling the
jumpers is usually quite easy. One can't defeat password
protection on a Sun without replacing a chip on the main
board. Now *that* is a reasonable level of security.
Maybe we've been too lax about this in the past, and should
have insisted that hardware manufacturers build in some
countermeasures. There are a lot of things they could do
which would be a TON more useful than the "trusted
computing" junk Intel's got in the works, and they need
not be elaborate or expensive to implement. Maybe the
press are just seeing the issue with fresh eyes, and we're
the ones with the wrong attitude.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/144/18317#18317