, 2003-02-24
Why last week's big Windows security hole is nothing more than technology press hot air.
Expand all |
Post comment
I agree completely.
2003-02-24
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
I agree completely.
2003-02-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
I agree completely - a little vauge, let's hear your arguments....
2003-02-25
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
If anyone thinks this is some new threat, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale for you
2003-02-24
3n0k (2 replies)
3n0k (2 replies)
Media Gone Mad
2003-02-25
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
Linux "boot" floppy? Wow, I'm impressed.
2003-02-26
TJ Miller jr (23 replies)
TJ Miller jr (23 replies)
My Experience with The Linux
2003-02-26
Egg Troll (14 replies)
Egg Troll (14 replies)
My Experience with The Linux
2003-02-27
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
"Third Party Driver" ? This is slanted in the other direction
2003-02-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
"Third Party Driver" ? This is slanted in the other direction
2003-02-27
Eric Grabowski (eric@mazenet.com)
Eric Grabowski (eric@mazenet.com)
It is unfortunate...
2003-03-03
Glenn Schulz (1 replies)
Glenn Schulz (1 replies)
It is unfortunate...that you don't understand
2003-03-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
It is unfortunate...that Glenn learned security from a text book.
2003-03-05
Erik (1 replies)
Erik (1 replies)

> It seems some "security experts"; namely Linux buffs, are trying
> desperately to find something with W2K/XP to complain about and blow
> out of proportion...
sorry but "linux buffs" already know that you can mount the disk
and do whatever they want.
the problem is with "windows experts" that still find it shocking that
there is software that doesn't implement pointless access controls.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/144/18326#18326