Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed
Mark Rasch, 2003-03-24

The United States could try out its much-hyped "cyberwarfare" capabilities in Iraq... but it would probably be illegal.

Comments Mode:
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-24
Tony Bradley
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-24
Keydet89
I'm not sure I see the point of this article at all. Cyberwar? Against what? It's pretty evident to anyone who's watched the CNN broadcasts for more than a few minutes that the reason the infrastructure is still in place is b/c our President wants it left in place.

So where does that leave us at the end of the article?

Uh...duh!

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/149/18788#18788
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-24
Anonymous
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-25
Curtis Karnow (1 replies)
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-26
Mark Rasch
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-25
Anonymous
Military Analysis: The Author is a bit off 2003-03-26
Seth Hidek (2 replies)
Military Analysis: The Author is a bit off 2003-03-27
Mark Rasch
Sidenote: the Value and Danger of Intelligence 2003-04-02
Drew Copley <dcopley@eeye.com>
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-26
desitter
Why the Dogs of War have been unleashed 2003-03-27
Infiltrator
Why we don't like IANA 2003-03-27
Anonymous
Why the Dogs of Cyberwar Stay Leashed 2003-03-27
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus