, 2003-04-07
A new poll finds that seventy-seven percent of security professionals believe Microsoft products are insecure. But a closer look at the survey tells a far more interesting story.
Expand all |
Post comment
The Reality of Perception
2003-04-07
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
The Reality of Perception
2003-04-07
AnonymousPeon (2 replies)
AnonymousPeon (2 replies)
The Reality of Perception - heh
2003-04-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Reality of Perception -
2003-04-08
AnonymousPeon (1 replies)
AnonymousPeon (1 replies)
The Reality of Perception -
2003-04-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Reality of Perception -
2003-04-09
AnonymousPeon (1 replies)
AnonymousPeon (1 replies)
The Reality of Perception
2003-04-07
Bill Hey <bill.hey@nospam.dsia.com> (1 replies)
Bill Hey <bill.hey@nospam.dsia.com> (1 replies)
The Reality of dumb people - "I see dumb people".
2003-04-09
Anonymous (8 replies)
Anonymous (8 replies)
The Reality of dumb people - "I see dumb people".
2003-04-09
Anonybori (1 replies)
Anonybori (1 replies)

Linux as part of it's *nix heritage has been designed with security from the outset, whereas Microsoft 3/9x/2k/XP were not.
They may however still suffer from the same frequency of "default" errors, or "user config" errors.
But like for like, on the balance of probability, you'd be wrong.
Still, wouldn't it be nice for 50:50 to emerge, nothing quite like a bit of competition to stir the truely creative urges (and no, "integration" is NOT "innovation" Microsoft), and increase quality. ;-)
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/152/19193#19193