Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Super-DMCA Not So Bad
Mark Rasch, 2003-04-14

The latest version of the controversial law could be a valuable weapon against thieves and pirates.

Comments Mode:
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-14
Anonymous
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-14
Anonymous
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-15
Anonymous
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-15
Mark Rasch (2 replies)
Super-DMCA Not So Practical 2003-04-16
Type 10
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-17
Anonymous (1 replies)
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-18
Anonymous
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-15
Andrea-Eboundary.Net
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-16
Anonymous
Are you out of your mind?? 2003-04-16
Anonymous
Super-DMCA Not So Bad 2003-04-16
Anonymous
Super-DMCA Not So What? 2003-04-16
Anonymous
I do not really care about Mr. Valenti's pockets. As a customer, I already refusing to buy devices and media that uses _this_ kind of protection, and not so politely declining any offers from the companies supporting DMCA every time I can. I am not a big spender, but I assume that from 2001 several companies lost may be a couple of thousands bucks of my business, and probably about $10K of my clients' business,too. Not a lot...

BTW, I did not by a Ford car just because their suit against 2600 magazine. And my wife did not get Nissan car - see http://www.nissan.com/ for more details. How much the supid lose because of greed?

From the sysadmin point of view: every protection these DMCA advocates will use can and will be broken by the bad guys. Every "protective" packet entering and leaving our networks - a grave threat to everybody's privacy and security, not to mention the bandwidth _we_ are paying for.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/153/19352#19352
What about Wireless? 2003-04-16
JtAB
Super-DMCA Not So Bad - err, wha? 2003-04-21
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus