, 2003-04-27
With Windows Server 2003, Microsoft has finally produced an operating system that isn't begging to be hacked on the first boot.
Expand all |
Post comment
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST.
2003-04-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST.
2003-04-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST.
2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST.
2003-04-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST.
2003-05-01
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST.
2003-05-02
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Secure by Default, Insecure by Birth
2003-04-28
Drek Software Inc. (2 replies)
Drek Software Inc. (2 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster...
2003-04-28
Penguinisto (4 replies)
Penguinisto (4 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster...
2003-04-28
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster...
2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster...
2003-04-29
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster...
2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms.
2003-04-29
matt@beatlab.org (2 replies)
matt@beatlab.org (2 replies)
Secure by Default
2003-04-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

Then, you try to sully another O/S by saying that "Oh, it was really hard to secure that Unix box." Oh please. No wait, coming from a ms person, I can believe that. Anything that requires command line input is beyond their click and drool O/S mind. How many more Bill Gates butt kissing articles are you going to write?
Look, we know ms isn't secure. And hey, we thank you, that's what keeps us employed. If the whole world ran on Unix boxes, the information security industry would have never come about.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/157/19636#19636