Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Secure by Default
Tim Mullen, 2003-04-27

With Windows Server 2003, Microsoft has finally produced an operating system that isn't begging to be hacked on the first boot.

Comments Mode:
Secure by Default, Insecure by Birth 2003-04-28
Drek Software Inc. (2 replies)
Secure by Default, Insecure by Birth 2003-05-03
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
alexbal
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
xenophi1e <oliver.lavery@sympatico.ca> (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-28
Penguinisto (4 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-28
Anonymous (6 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-05-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
xenophi1e <oliver.lavery@sympatico.ca>
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-04-29
matt@beatlab.org (2 replies)
Amen. If i had a nickel for every clueless MCSE I've met - I'd retire. (Not to discount them all, obviously, blanket statements never work)
It's funny how I constantly see '*NIX Zealots' referred to.. yet, I bet the majority of those refering to us as "zealots" slapped some lame Linux distribution on a box, and missed their start button, so it's time to bash UNIX? What? Qmail isn't point and click? Sweet Jesus! Free Software can't be good! - Get a clue. Linux is hardly any better than Win32 platforms IMHO. The Linux community has gotten as uneducated as the M$ community... Possibly even surpassed them. *sigh* As the cert classes fill up and CCNA's are rubber stamped and handed out to kids who barely understand basic concepts of tcp/ip. Just because you run Linux, does not qualify you as a UNIX guru, nor does it qualify you to compare UNIX to WIN32 platforms. To say closed-source M$ is more secure than any open-source, is laughable. Maybe if you lack the knowledge to patch the hole yourself.. With source at hand, you can find holes before they're already being exploited, nor do you have to wait on some lazy programming staff to release a 10 line patch, that's going to break something else in their OS. Bliss in ignorance, I suppose.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/157/19647#19647
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-04-29
blacklight (1 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-05-02
Penguinisto
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-05-06
Noran Rad
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
blacklight
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-04-29
Anonymous (3 replies)
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-04-30
Th. Klein
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-02
blacklight (2 replies)
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-02
Anonymous
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-03
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Doug Sibley (3 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-30
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-05-03
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-05-01
Anonymous
Hrm 2003-04-30
DC0 (1 replies)
Hrm 2003-05-02
Ryan Lambert
Secure by Default 2003-05-02
Ryan Lambert







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus