Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Secure by Default
Tim Mullen, 2003-04-27

With Windows Server 2003, Microsoft has finally produced an operating system that isn't begging to be hacked on the first boot.

Comments Mode:
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-05-01
Anonymous (3 replies)
Uhm, actually, I am a network administrator for a company of 150 users (Toronto) and 58 (Montreal) and I have never seen an MCSE study book in my life. There goes that bit of nonsense. Now, the things I listed above are the basic requirements for setting up a secure Windows 2000/3 AD environment, and I (and my team) have implemented all of these measures. Not being a windows administrator, this may sound like really complex stuff for you, but its really the basics. Anyone with any experience would have an answer to the questions (one liners, I'm not expecting a speech). This guy says he is "hacking it up"; well if he is, I would hope he is hacking up a little more then just the desktop - or his "review" is pointless. Think about it, that would be like me installing a base copy of SuSE 8.0 on my desktop, farting around the security options in YaST2 and not really knowing anything about the underlying OS.

Thanks for the half intelligent response, very refreshing from most on this thread.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/157/19715#19715
Secure by Default, Insecure by Birth 2003-04-28
Drek Software Inc. (2 replies)
Secure by Default, Insecure by Birth 2003-05-03
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
alexbal
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
xenophi1e <oliver.lavery@sympatico.ca> (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-28
Penguinisto (4 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-28
Anonymous (6 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-05-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
xenophi1e <oliver.lavery@sympatico.ca>
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-04-29
matt@beatlab.org (2 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-04-29
blacklight (1 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-05-02
Penguinisto
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-05-06
Noran Rad
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
blacklight
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-04-29
Anonymous (3 replies)
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-04-30
Th. Klein
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-02
blacklight (2 replies)
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-02
Anonymous
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-03
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Doug Sibley (3 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-30
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-05-03
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-05-01
Anonymous
Hrm 2003-04-30
DC0 (1 replies)
Hrm 2003-05-02
Ryan Lambert
Secure by Default 2003-05-02
Ryan Lambert







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus