Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Secure by Default
Tim Mullen, 2003-04-27

With Windows Server 2003, Microsoft has finally produced an operating system that isn't begging to be hacked on the first boot.

Comments Mode:
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-04-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-05-01
Anonymous (3 replies)
Secure by Default - READ BEFORE YOU POST. 2003-05-03
Anonymous
Sure, you can rattle down a list of strange-sounding things you have to do to a Windows machine to make it secure. So what? Any Unix geek (or VMS fanatic, or OS/390 hand, or...) can rattle down a similar list leaving you wondering what they are talking about. Good for you (and your company) you know your Win2k3 stuff by heart.

The big trouble has allways been the "one size fits all", "managing a machine/network/firewall/... is dead simple, just point & click", "features over anything else" that has been the uniform ranting of many companies, MS over all of them (because they concentrated more on the unwashed masses). Now you have to battle not only the threats, but also the people around you that consider you grossly incompetent because "computing is _so_ easy"...

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/157/19762#19762
Secure by Default, Insecure by Birth 2003-04-28
Drek Software Inc. (2 replies)
Secure by Default, Insecure by Birth 2003-05-03
Anonymous (2 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
alexbal
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-28
xenophi1e <oliver.lavery@sympatico.ca> (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-28
Penguinisto (4 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-28
Anonymous (6 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-05-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
xenophi1e <oliver.lavery@sympatico.ca>
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-04-29
matt@beatlab.org (2 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-04-29
blacklight (1 replies)
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-05-02
Penguinisto
Zealotry comes in all forms. 2003-05-06
Noran Rad
Well, I'll give you this much, Timster... 2003-04-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
blacklight
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-04-29
Anonymous (3 replies)
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-04-30
Th. Klein
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-02
blacklight (2 replies)
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-02
Anonymous
Secure by Default (Pathetic) 2003-05-03
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Doug Sibley (3 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-30
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-05-03
Anonymous
Secure by Default 2003-04-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Secure by Default 2003-05-01
Anonymous
Hrm 2003-04-30
DC0 (1 replies)
Hrm 2003-05-02
Ryan Lambert
Secure by Default 2003-05-02
Ryan Lambert







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus